Project Management Discussion
September 06, 2010, 05:32:01 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: WELCOME! To the New Project Management Discussion Board! There is a great deal of depth to this site - both in the forums and in the many other sections of the site. Please take your time, explore, learn, contribute. We are glad you are here.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Contact Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Risk Impact Prioritisation  (Read 348 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jeremytwist
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« on: February 22, 2010, 06:03:11 AM »

I am currently trying to create criteria for the impact levels of various risks found in the risk log. So far I have settled on the following:

Blocker
High
Medium
Low

However, now I would like some criteria for these four levels so everyone in the organization understands what they represent. I have proposed the following:

Blocker - Prevents high priority requirements from being met or any further project development from being made.

High - Severely compromises meeting requirements or results in extended delays in project development.

Medium - Some requirements may not be met or the project may be delayed.

Low - Some requirements may not be fully satisfied or the project may be delayed for a short period of time.

I would really appreciate it if I could get some feedback on this. I have looked everywhere and it seems that nobody has actually given criteria for impact levels in the risk log.

Many Thanks,
Jeremy

 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Home - Contact Us - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - PMD Team - Report a Problem - Advertise With Us
© 2007 Project Management Discussion
Powered by MKPortal ©2003-2006 mkportal.it